Some Trivia about Silicon Diodes

About a century ago, the first (AM) radio receivers were made using coils, capacitors, and crude components as their only active one, called ‘Crystals’ (as well as high-impedance earphones). These crystals or ‘Whiskers’ were essentially diodes, formed from whatever mismatched pairs of conductive or semi-conductive substances a person could find, such as between ‘an iron wire’ and ‘the tarnish on a penny’. And a question which I’ve been asked was, “Why can’t the technology today just use a tuned circuit, and a silicon diode as the components?”

The answer is very basic. A silicon diode needs to have a forward voltage of at least 0.5V applied to it, before it goes from a non-conductive state to a conductive state. This is based on the Gap Energy of Silicon, or, the energy required to create an electron-electron-hole pair. It can happen that large diodes conduct some small amount of current at lower voltages, but this represents a region, in which their diffusion current is almost as low as their leakage current, which is constantly flowing in the opposite direction to the diffusion current. In short, in this sub-gap voltage-region, the diode fails to change in properties, as current flows through it in both directions, and fails to act as a diode. This amount of voltage is also referred to as ‘One Diode-Drop’. (:1)

The same thing happens between the Base and the Emitter of a Bipolar Transistor. In the NPN example, the Base must be at least one diode-drop more positive, and in the PNP example, it must be at least one diode-drop more negative than the Emitter, before the transistor ‘turns on’. This can frustrate people who try to create better rectifiers, just by connecting the Collector to the Base. This way, the curve that defines the current increases more sharply, but still only, after one diode-drop of voltage. But it can help IC designers, who want to keep Parasitic Transistors from turning on, and who can sometimes connect what would be the Base, and what would be the Emitter, of such a Parasitic Transistor, together.


(Update 7/30/2019, 0h05 : )

There is a related question which people do not generally ask me, but which I needed to know the answer to myself at some point in time. When the types of semiconductor components are drawn as a 2D layout, of a 3D construction, there is not only N-doped and P-doped silicon, but also N+ -doped and P+ -doped silicon. Why?

The answer lies in the fact that when a metal with a high work-factor, which is another way to say, with high electronegativity, comes into contact with regular, N-doped silicon, the electronegativity of the metal ‘draws away’ the majority free electrons, creating a region of silicon that behaves similarly to P-doped silicon. Right there, in that region, a “Schottky Barrier Diode” forms. And a problem in semiconductor manufacturing is, that this will happen every time the same type of metal comes into contact with the N-doped silicon, even if an Ohmic contact is desired.

Therefore, a type of N-doped silicon will be used as well, which has such an excess of dopant, that by itself, it fails to act as a semiconductor anymore. But, sandwiched between the metal and the regular N-doped silicon, it serves to form a contact, which is not a diode. In fact, if a single well of N-doped silicon has nothing but a metal junction at one end, but an N+ -doped (sub-)well with a metal contact at the other end, then what results is an actual Schottky Diode component, exploiting the junction effect on the end that does not use N+ -doped silicon. That end becomes the Anode, the side to which a positive potential needs to be applied, to result in forward conduction.

What some people might hope is that, if such a diode-type and N-doped well are incorporated into the P-doped substrate directly, this could lead to a simplified way to add diodes to CMOS logic.

However, I think that the WiKiPedia article exaggerates somewhat, about the degree by which the Schottky Diode has a lower voltage-drop, than a so-called ‘regular’ diode – a P-N diode. The diode-type which they mention: ‘1N5817′, according to my own data-sheets, only goes as low as 0.32V, at a temperature of 25⁰C. The target which the WiKiPedia suggests, of 0.15V, is only achieved at a temperature of 125⁰C. And that is pretty much the lowest-voltage of the Schottky Diodes. The voltage-drop is less than that for regular, P-N diodes, but at best, still half that.


Actually, the subject can be described in greater detail, of what the current-voltage relationship of diodes is. This requires understanding a fact about semiconductors, which is, that semiconductors only become that, above a certain temperature. Below that temperature they are insulators, and above an even higher temperature, they become regular, Ohmic conductors. This means that the thermal agitation energy of silicon is the main cause for the formation of its electron-electron-hole pairs.

Basically, a Schottky Diode is really just another diode, with a different set of parameters. The following article explains an approximation for computing the current that flows through a Schottky Diode:

This article explains the approximation for diodes in general:

Close inspection reveals that they are the same equation, essentially. This equation is also known as the “Schockley Diode Equation”. What it states in English is, that there is a constant amount of saturation current (IS), which is offset by an amount of diffusion current that is the antilogarithm of voltage. The fact that the saturation current is always flowing at a constant rate, and opposite the intended polarity, has been factorized out as the ( -1) of the term that follows (IS) both times. What this really means is that the zero-voltage (equilibrium) -current, as well as positive net currents, all exist somewhere as multiples of the same saturation current.

But there is also the Ideality Factor (N), of which the lowest numbers are most ideal, and which modulates how rapidly this antilogarithmic current changes as a function of voltage. I don’t think that (N) can become lower than (1.0).

Schottky Diodes are simply diodes, with another set of parameters. Their current curve is really continuous, just like that of regular, P-N diodes. But, they have an Ideality Factor close to (1.0), while, maybe, P-N diodes have closer to (2.0)?


Now, If one wanted to relate this equation to the Collector Current of a Bipolar Transistor, then one could say, that the resulting current has simply been multiplied by the transistor’s Current Gain…


Now, I have seen some semiconductor layouts, in which both N+ and P+ -doped silicon regions are used. But the question that I have about this is:

‘Presumably, only one type of metal coming into direct contact with the silicon is being used to make one type of IC. That type of metal can either be more electronegative or less electronegative than silicon. Therefore, it should only be necessary to use either N+ or P+ -doped silicon in the same IC, not both.’

And I have yet to see a good reply to that.


(Update 11/27/2019, 6h35 : )


I suppose that another answer which I should acknowledge is the fact, that when earphones were first invented, they tended to have an impedance of about 2kΩ. This made them very high-quality earphones. Today’s earphones have a much lower impedance, of maybe 40Ω if the customer is lucky, but maybe even as low as 16Ω for lower-quality earphones. They have fewer turns of enamelled wire on their voice-coil.

A 16Ω set of earphones will require much more current, to produce audible output, than a 2kΩ earphone will require – but not necessarily require more voltage. But, a tuned circuit driven by a direct antenna input, will not tend to generate this amount of current.


(Update 10/18/2020, 11h40: )

Even though people may leave comments directly to one posting of mine, on this blog, a reader has left me a contact form which he filled out, but on the subject of Schottky Diodes.

I hope that I am not overstepping my authority, to post what that reader wrote, here. I think he wanted the information to be made known:


Re: Schottky diode forward voltage You seem to be under impression that the Schottky diode\’s forward voltage drop is not a “big improvement” over typical silicon diodes. That may be the case in applications where you don\’t care about the voltage drop. In other applications, though, Schottky diodes are game changers. The fact that the Schottky diode has half the forward voltage of a normal silicon diode was of monumental importance in developing the Schottky TTL logic family: the addition of a clamping Schottky diode between the base and the collector of the transistors used allowed the transistors to operate as switches without saturating. Try to put together some simple STTL (Schottky TTL) gates out of discrete components and you\’ll see that a silicon diode simply doesn\’t work in this application: the availability of Schottky diodes was a total game-changer. Of course they were manufactured in an integrated (chip) process and added a tiny bit of space to the existing transistor, being almost “free”, and turning the transistor into a Schottky transistor, but you can build those out of discrete components just fine. Also, when building switching power converters, the losses on the diode switches have a big impact on efficiency – going from a “plain” silicon to Schottky diode cuts the power dissipation in the diode by half. That is a big deal. In fact, it\’s such a big deal that for ultimate efficiency even the Schottky diode may not be enough – giving rise to synchronous rectifiers, where a mosfet (typically) or a bipolar transistor replaces the freewheeeling diode.


That reader’s name was stated as ‘Kuba Sunderland-Ober’. As far as I can tell, what was written by this contributor seems true and correct. I hope that, because I’ve posted his paragraph here, his information will contribute to the information on the blog in a positive way.

It was already stated in this posting of mine, that Schottky Diodes potentially have an ideality factor, which could be ‘twice as good’, or ‘half the value’, of the ideality factor of bipolar diodes.

Also, it is not by design that I have removed the formatting with which this reader filled out the contact form. My software also does this for any other information which readers may type in the contact form. Usually, the loss of formatting would not bother me.

The context in which I was trivializing the properties of Schottky Diodes was, in the context of their potentially replacing ‘crystals’ in so-called AM Crystal Receivers. A real person had asked me, why the strategy used as the design of crystal sets, is no longer used in AM Radio. There is more than one reason for this, only one of which would be, the forward voltage-drop of a Schottky Diode. The crystals in crystal receivers did tend to function as Schottky Diodes, but were not silicon-based. ‘Other semiconductors’ will have a gap energy different from silicon, thus also potentially having lower gap energy, and therefore, a lower, forward voltage drop.




Playing with NG-SPICE again, and designing two resonant-circuit bandpass filters.

NG-SPICE is a program designed to simulate circuits. The acronym stands for (Next Generation) Simulation Program, with Integrated Circuit Emphasis. While NG-SPICE is open-source, its cousins such as LT-SPICE and PSpice are proprietary. However, NG-SPICE also uses advanced Mathematical modelling of components and circuits. Sometimes I find it to be an educational toy.

A type of circuit which some people might find interesting, is the IF strip – the Intermediate Frequency stage – of a radio receiver, which receives its signal after the Radio-Frequency signal has been ‘mixed’ with a Local Oscillator, and heterodyned down to the Intermediate Frequencies. And due to modern technology, a final, intermediate frequency of 450kHz can be used both for AM and FM demodulation.

There is a type of resonant circuit that employs capacitors and inductors – i.e., coils, in order to accomplish two things:

  • To act as a bandpass filter, restricting the frequency range,
  • To establish a phase-shift between the incoming carrier wave, and an oscillating, derived wave, that is dependent on the momentary frequency of the carrier wave, so that later in the analog processing of the signal, a phase-discriminator can complete the task of FM demodulation. This task is also referred to as Quadrature Demodulation of an FM carrier.

This type of resonant circuit is also sometimes referred to as a “Tank Circuit”.

In short, I’ve been reinventing the wheel. But I did read an article from elsewhere on the Internet, which inspired me. The subject of that article was, how to design Varactors, which are variable-capacitance diodes, when restricted to only using CMOS transistor-pairs. These diodes would represent a good way to tune circuits and vary the frequency of oscillators, in many types of applications. But I had an application in mind, which this type of varactor would help me solve. The mentioned, “IMOS Varactors” are remarkable because they don’t actually involve any diodes. They involve a way to connect an enhancement-mode P-channel MOSFET, so that the effect of gate-voltage changes on the MOSFET’s gate capacitance, acts as a varactor.


If somebody is designing a tuned circuit using the smallest, most-modern coils, manufactured by high-tech factories, then those coils allow for a high Q-factor to exist, which is a measure of how selective the filter can become, as well as to have good thermal stability, but if they are on a budget, these components will have some amount of tolerance, meaning that in a constant way, each component’s actual inductance value will vary to some degree. This is especially unfortunate since high-quality inductors on a budget, are also unlikely to be tunable. If the inductor in question is of a better sort, that ‘only’ has 5% tolerance, this would mean that with an improperly designed radio tuned to an intended AM frequency of 800kHz, instead, the listener could end up receiving a station at 780kHz, or at 820kHz, just because this one filter’s frequency is off by 5%. Of course, real radios that are designed to any level of satisfaction don’t behave that way.

What can be done, is that in the assembly-process for the radio, some machine calibrates its tuned circuits. But again, a maximal use of the main integrated circuit is assumed, and a minimal expense of external, discrete components is assumed. Here, a trimming potentiometer is a more-affordable way to do, what back in the 1970s and 1980s, tunable inductors would have done. If the assumption was made that for reasons I won’t go in to here, The IC can hold an exact voltage steady, then this voltage can also be applied to varactors internal to the IC, in a way that corrects for whatever amount of error was present in the coil.

Even though today, tunable inductors can be bought in quantity that also offer a Q-factor of 48, those aren’t just more expensive than the fixed variety. In addition, those would be much larger components, measuring maybe ‘half a centimetre’ cubed, and requiring to be soldered in to the circuit-board, while the fixed sort can be much smaller units, soldered onto a circuit-board as a surface-mounted device.

And so, reinventing the wheel in order to educate myself, what I have done was to design two circuits, one of which tunes in to 450kHz with the aid of such monolithic varactors, and the second of which does the same at 10Mhz instead. I’m using transistors that are not the tiniest in existence, but which are still too tiny, for an implementation of these ideas to be attempted with discrete components. Capacitances in picofarads should act as a warning to any reader, not to try this with discrete components. It’s much less-risky financially, just to run some simulations using NG-SPICE…

(Updated 7/27/2019, 12h05 … )

Continue reading Playing with NG-SPICE again, and designing two resonant-circuit bandpass filters.